Since 1989, Lloyd, Gray, Whitehead & Monroe, P.C. has steadily and consistently grown from 4 to 36 attorneys providing full-service litigation for clients throughout the Southeast. We recently added another chapter to our history, opening an office in Florida to complement our headquarters in Alabama. We continue to grow and expand our staff, but ever mindful of our belief in staying lean and efficient. We serve our clients best with effective outcomes.

NEWS + MEDIA

architects and engineers

OWNER'S NEGLIGENCE SUIT AGAINST STRUCTURAL ENGINEER UNTIMELY

In Preyde One, LLC v. Hoffman Consultants, LLC, 2020 WL 908943 (Mich. App. Feb. 25, 2020), a Michigan appellate court ruled that a project owner's claim against a structural engineer was a malpractice claim, governed by the malpractice statute of limitations and untimely. Preyde One, LLC ("Owner") sued Glasers Lumber ("Glasers") for breach of contract for allegedly providing defective work and materials on the construction of a hotel. Glasers identified Hoffman Consultants, LLC ("Hoffman"), the structural engineer for the hotel, as a responsible non-party and Owner filed a Second Amended Complaint against Hoffman, alleging Hoffman negligently prepared the drawings and specifications and negligently inspected and supervised the structural work.

construction

FLORIDA APPELLATE COURT AFFIRMS DISCHARGE OF SUBCONTRACTOR’S MECHANIC’S LIEN WHEN SUBCONTRACTOR FAILED TO SHOW GOOD CAUSE FOR ITS FAILURE TO FORECLOSE

In Management & Consulting, Inc. v. Tech Electric, Inc., the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, reviewed a lower court’s denial of a motion for discharge of a mechanic’s lien. 2020 WL 1540958 (Fla. 3d Dist. Ct. App. 2020). The Appellate Court found a subcontractor failed to comply with the requirements of section 713.21(4), Florida Statutes, when it asserted the validity of its mechanic’s lien, but failed to show good cause as to why its lien had not been enforced or file a foreclosure suit within the statutory timeframe.

environmental

D.C. CIRCUIT REINSTITUTES EPA RESTRICTIONS ON HFCs AS OSDs

The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has ruled EPA acted improperly when it suspended restrictions on the use of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) to replace ozone-depleting substances (ODSs). Natural Resources Defense Council v. Wheeler, No. 18:1172 (D.C. Cir. April 2020). EPA did this without going through notice-and-comment procedures, which is what the Natural Resources Defense Council challenged and won.

employment

PRESIDENT SIGNS CARES ACT ATTACHING STRINGS TO BUSINESS LOANS

On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), which is a $2 trillion relief package aimed to help diminish the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Act includes certain provisions particularly relevant to employers.

securities

FINRA AMENDS ARBITRATION CODE TO EXPAND OPTIONS FOR CUSTOMERS IF A FIRM OR ASSOCIATED PERSON IS OR BECOMES INACTIVE

FINRA amended its Code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes (Customer Code) to expand the options available to customer claimants dealing with “inactive members”—those firms or individuals whose FINRA registration has been terminated, suspended, canceled, or revoked, or who have been expelled or barred from FINRA. FINRA has amended the Customer Code to further the routes available to customers in situations where a firm becomes inactive during a pending arbitration or where an associated person becomes inactive either before a claim is filed or during a pending arbitration.

workers compensation

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FINDS EMPLOYER FAILED TO PROVE EMPLOYEE RETURNED TO WORK MAKING THE SAME OR GREATER AVERAGE WEEKLY WAGE AND THE RETURN TO WORK STATUTE DID NOT APPLY

On October 4, 2019, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released AMEC Foster Wheeler Kamtech, Inc. v. Chandler, -- So. 3d --, 2019 WL 4894327 (Ala. Civ. App. 2019), which found the employer, Defendant AMEC Foster Wheeler Kamtech, Inc., failed to prove the employee, Plaintiff Jimmy Chandler, returned to work making the same or greater average weekly wage (“AWW”) and that Ala. Code § 25-5-57(a)(3)i (the “return-to-work” statute) did not apply to prevent the trial court from awarding damages based on Plaintiff’s vocational impairment.

We are known as lawyers,

but we’re really problem solvers.

PRACTICE AREAS

Architects and Engineers/Design Professionals

Construction

Coverage

Employment

Environmental

Fair Housing and Public Accommodation

General Liability

Insurance Fraud/Special Investigations

Medical & Healthcare

Professional Liability

Securities

Worker's Compensation

Architects and Engineers/Design Professionals

Architects and engineers are held to a higher standard of care. When disputes arise alleging a design or engineering flaw, these professionals may be exposed to liability claims involving their livelihood, reputation and professional licensure. We recognize the level of skill and knowledge required to vigorously defend architects and engineers when they are accused of failing to meet the standard of care. We represent design professionals throughout the country.

Construction

Every construction defect dispute presents a unique set of circumstances requiring the experience and versatility our construction litigation team offers. LGWM’s Construction Practice Group includes experienced attorneys who understand the issues and complexities involving building projects.