When an insurer attempts to limit its exposure, it must keep all of the policy in mind—not just a few discrete parts. Recently, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas determined that a ransomware attack did not fall within the cyber insurance policy’s “Ransomware Sub-Limit Endorsement,” and the insurer was unable…
Read More
Insurance towers provide significant protection for many businesses. Insurance towers are comprised of a primary insurer followed by layers of excess insurers. Once the primary insurer’s policy limits have been exhausted, the first layer excess insurer takes over until its policy limits are exhausted. This process continues until the claim is paid in full or…
Read More
Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment on behalf of an insurer on grounds of untimely notice in A.B. by & through J.B. v. Barrow, No. 24-13138, 2026 WL 40906, — F.4th — (11th Cir. Jan. 7, 2026). In 2018, A.B. filed an invasion-of-privacy lawsuit against Barrow…
Read More
The Eleventh Circuit recently solidified how the notice requirement works in claims-made policies by relying on the majority view of courts on this issue. In L. Squared Indus., Inc. v. Nautilus Ins. Co., the Eleventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment for Nautilus Insurance Company (“Nautilus”), holding that the failure to provide timely notice by the insured…
Read More
The Eleventh Circuit recently determined that a “misappropriation exclusion” did not wholly foreclose coverage in a malpractice lawsuit stemming from a law firm’s representation of defendants facing civil foreclosure in a RICO action. Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Fellows Labriola LLP, No. 25-10837, 2025 WL 2886733 (11th Cir. Oct. 10, 2025). In doing so, the…
Read More
Although the number of cyber security attacks continues to rise, courts are not unified on how insurance policies apply. This is evident by how two cases were decided differently despite the insureds suffering similar cyber security events. In Kane v. Syndicate 2623-623 Lloyd’s of London, 2025 WL 1733046 (N.M. Ct. App. June 16, 2025), a…
Read More
Last month, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida dismissed with prejudice a declaratory judgment action filed by a purported third-party beneficiary against an errors-and-omissions insurer based on application of a professional-services exclusion. See Speckin Forensics, LLC, v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co., No. 9:25-cv-80383-AMC (S.D. Fla. Aug. 8, 2025). Speckin,…
Read More
Artificial Intelligence is an emerging technology that rapidly has infiltrated all aspects of everyday life, including business and commerce. AI allows users to quickly perform and complete tasks that ordinarily would take substantial time, energy, and human effort to achieve a finished result. AI products are readily available to users, both in free, open source…
Read More
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is constantly revolutionizing industries, and claims handling is no exception. These advancements come with growing pains: the use of AI in claims determinations has become the subject of bad-faith litigation. Although AI is relatively new, the bad faith arguments are not. Bad faith lawsuits concerning the use of technology in claims handling…
Read More
In 1955, the Alabama Supreme Court established a rule that loss-of-use damages in vehicle cases were recoverable only if the vehicle was repairable. Hunt v. Ward, 79 So. 2d 20, 25-26 (Ala. 1955) (the “Hunt rule”). This meant that an interested party could not recover “for both [the] total loss of an automobile and loss…
Read More
Our locations in Birmingham and Pensacola are conveniently located for clients in the Southeast.
Get In Touch