News & Insights

Practice Area: Coverage

SELF INSUREDS MUST PERFORM THEIR CONTRACTUAL DUTIES BEFORE THE INSURER STEPS IN: A LESSON FROM THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Insurers who issue liability policies that include self-insured retentions (SIRs) have limited obligations to their insureds unless and until the damages and claim expenses exceed the SIR amount. So, what happens if the insured does nothing to defend themselves, resulting in the entry of a default judgment in an amount exceeding the SIR? Under Georgia…
Read More

HAWAII SUPREME COURT RULES GREENHOUSE GASES ARE “POLLUTANTS” AND RESULTING PROPERTY DAMAGE FROM CLIMATE-CHANGE-RELATED EVENTS BARRED BY POLLUTION EXCLUSION

In Aloha Petroleum, Ltd. v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 155 Haw. 108, 557 P.3d 837 (2024), Aloha Petroleum, Ltd. sought a defense from its liability insurers for separate lawsuits brought by Hawaiian municipalities. The municipalities alleged that, as of the 1960s, the fossil fuel industry knew “its products would cause catastrophic climate…
Read More

LIABILITY INSURERS BEWARE: AUTO ACCIDENT TIME-LIMITED DEMANDS IN GEORGIA

Liability insurers are no strangers to time-limited demands sent by plaintiff’s counsel. In Georgia, these demands are called Holt demands after the seminal case S. Gen. Ins. Co. v. Holt, 416 S.E.2d 274 (Ga. 1992). In Holt, the Georgia Supreme Court held that an insurer can be liable to its insured for unreasonably declining a…
Read More

RIPENESS AND THE DUTY TO INDEMNIFY IN ALABAMA

The general rule in Alabama is that a duty to indemnify cannot be determined before liability is established. But are there exceptions to that rule? In James Snell v. United States Insurance Co., 102 F.4th 1208 (11th Cir. 2024), the Eleventh Circuit weighed in and unequivocally answered “yes.” Snell involved coverage under a commercial general…
Read More

Appellate Court Affirms Summary Judgment In Favor Of Insured For Coverage Of Losses From Ransomware Attack

A New Jersey appeals court affirmed summary judgment for insured pharmaceutical company Merck in a cyber coverage dispute regarding a “Hostile/Warlike Action” exclusion included in a $1.75 billion “all risks” property insurance program. Merck & Co., Inc. v. Ace American Ins. Co., No. A-1879-21, A-1882-21, 2023 WL 3160845 (N.J. Sup. Ct. App. Div. 2023).   …
Read More

Eighth Circuit Affirms Policy Provides No Coverage For Business Interruption

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recently became the first appellate court to weigh in on the litany of lawsuits filed by businesses seeking coverage for business interruption resulting from COVID-19-related restrictions. Oral Surgeons, P.C. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 2 F.4th 1141 (8th Cir. 2021). In a big win for insurers,…
Read More

Appellate Courts To Hear Business Owners’ Claims For Insurance Coverage For Business Interruption

This week has seen a few notable updates in the ongoing dispute regarding insurance coverage for business interruption resulting from COVID-19-related business closures, as federal and state appellate courts finally have had the opportunity to weigh in on these arguments. On September 29, 2020 in Iowa, United States District Judge Charles R. Wolle granted with…
Read More

Business Owners Experiencing Some Success In Covid Business Interruption Lawsuits

The Eleventh Circuit continues to dismiss suits brought by business owners seeking coverage for losses caused by COVID-19. But policyholders in other jurisdictions have achieved some notable wins so far in 2021. While “success” often means a policyholder merely survived dismissal on the pleadings, some courts have ruled in favor of policyholders in later stages…
Read More