News & Insights

Practice Area: Coverage

AI CLAIMS HANDLING AND BAD FAITH LITIGATION

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is constantly revolutionizing industries, and claims handling is no exception. These advancements come with growing pains: the use of AI in claims determinations has become the subject of bad-faith litigation. Although AI is relatively new, the bad faith arguments are not. Bad faith lawsuits concerning the use of technology in claims handling…
Read More

INDEPENDENT COUNSEL CHOICE OF LAW – WHOSE STANDARD IS IT, ANYWAY?

As claim adjusters know, a thorny issue in many liability claims is whether the insured is entitled to independent counsel. Jurisdictions take three general approaches to independent counsel. In some jurisdictions, such as Mississippi, whenever a carrier is defending under a reservation of rights, the insured is entitled to independent counsel. Moeller v. American Guar….
Read More

SELF INSUREDS MUST PERFORM THEIR CONTRACTUAL DUTIES BEFORE THE INSURER STEPS IN: A LESSON FROM THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Insurers who issue liability policies that include self-insured retentions (SIRs) have limited obligations to their insureds unless and until the damages and claim expenses exceed the SIR amount. So, what happens if the insured does nothing to defend themselves, resulting in the entry of a default judgment in an amount exceeding the SIR? Under Georgia…
Read More

HAWAII SUPREME COURT RULES GREENHOUSE GASES ARE “POLLUTANTS” AND RESULTING PROPERTY DAMAGE FROM CLIMATE-CHANGE-RELATED EVENTS BARRED BY POLLUTION EXCLUSION

In Aloha Petroleum, Ltd. v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 155 Haw. 108, 557 P.3d 837 (2024), Aloha Petroleum, Ltd. sought a defense from its liability insurers for separate lawsuits brought by Hawaiian municipalities. The municipalities alleged that, as of the 1960s, the fossil fuel industry knew “its products would cause catastrophic climate…
Read More

LIABILITY INSURERS BEWARE: AUTO ACCIDENT TIME-LIMITED DEMANDS IN GEORGIA

Liability insurers are no strangers to time-limited demands sent by plaintiff’s counsel. In Georgia, these demands are called Holt demands after the seminal case S. Gen. Ins. Co. v. Holt, 416 S.E.2d 274 (Ga. 1992). In Holt, the Georgia Supreme Court held that an insurer can be liable to its insured for unreasonably declining a…
Read More

RIPENESS AND THE DUTY TO INDEMNIFY IN ALABAMA

The general rule in Alabama is that a duty to indemnify cannot be determined before liability is established. But are there exceptions to that rule? In James Snell v. United States Insurance Co., 102 F.4th 1208 (11th Cir. 2024), the Eleventh Circuit weighed in and unequivocally answered “yes.” Snell involved coverage under a commercial general…
Read More

Appellate Court Affirms Summary Judgment In Favor Of Insured For Coverage Of Losses From Ransomware Attack

A New Jersey appeals court affirmed summary judgment for insured pharmaceutical company Merck in a cyber coverage dispute regarding a “Hostile/Warlike Action” exclusion included in a $1.75 billion “all risks” property insurance program. Merck & Co., Inc. v. Ace American Ins. Co., No. A-1879-21, A-1882-21, 2023 WL 3160845 (N.J. Sup. Ct. App. Div. 2023).   …
Read More