On January 5, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) proposed a rule to ban non-compete agreements between employers and workers. The proposed rule would prevent employers from requiring workers to agree to contract clauses that prevent the worker from seeking or accepting employment with another employer or operating a business after the conclusion of the…
Read More
The statute of repose is a powerful defense for a design or construction professional, since most provide an absolute bar to claims filed outside the repose period. Tennessee’s statute of repose was recently found to apply to contractual indemnity claims, when the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee granted summary judgment…
Read More
In Enrique Feldman and Feldman Architecture v. Florida Department of Professional Regulation, So. 3d WL 17576861, (Fla. 1d DCA 2022), the First District Court of Appeal of Florida ruled against an architect for his online marketing of design services in Florida. Enrique Feldman is an architect with thirty-five years of experience in Venezuela, but was…
Read More
On December 9, 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed a rule restricting the use of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). In a prepublication document, the EPA proposed the restriction of HFCs in refrigeration, air conditioning, heat pumps, foam blowing, and aerosols by 2025. The restriction would only apply if more environmentally friendly alternatives are available. According…
Read More
On December 7, 2022, President Joe Biden (“President Biden”) signed the Speak Out Act (“The Act”), which bans the use of pre-dispute, non-disclosure and non-disparagement contract clauses involving sexual assault and sexual harassment claims. The Act applies to agreements between employers, current employees, former employees and independent contractors. Pursuant to The Act, a non-disclosure clause…
Read More
In Ascot Corporation, LLC v. I&R Waterproofing, Inc., the Court of Appeals of North Carolina recently held that a subcontractor responsible for waterproofing could properly pursue the manufacturer of the waterproofing system for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, but not for breach of express warranty, contribution, or negligence-based indemnity. Additionally, the Court held…
Read More
In State ex rel. Stein v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., the North Carolina Supreme Court considered whether two companies spun off from E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”) could avoid personal jurisdiction in cases regarding claims involving the release of PFAS by asserting that those companies had never done business…
Read More
In Tinsley-Williamson ex rel. Tinsley v. A.R. Mays Construction, Inc., 195 N.E.3d 891 (Ind. Ct. App. 2022), the Court of Appeals of Indiana affirmed partial summary judgment in favor of A.R. Mays Construction, Inc. (“A.R. Mays”), a general contractor, on the ground that neither it nor any of its subcontractors had contracted with the company…
Read More
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida erred when it dismissed a suit against a group of Burger King franchisees that alleged the restaurants illegally maintained no-hire and no-poach agreements. The workers claimed Burger King’s franchisee agreements prevented them from obtaining employment at other franchise restaurants. See Arrington v. Burger King…
Read More
In a November 10, 2022, interview with CNBC’s “Squawk Box”, SEC Chair Gary Gensler called for greater protections for investors in the cryptocurrency space following the stunning collapse of crypto exchange FTX. According to FTX’s now-former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, the crypto exchange is facing a shortfall of up to $8 billion. On November 2, 2022,…
Read More
Our locations in Birmingham and Pensacola are conveniently located for clients in the Southeast.
Get In Touch