News & Insights

Practice Area: Architects and Engineers

Colorado Appellate Court Rules Limitaiton Of Liability Provision In Engineer’s Contract Was Ambiguous, But Not Void

In Johnson Nathan Strohe, P.C. v. MEP Engineering, Inc., 2021 WL 4314216 (Colo. App. Sept. 23, 2021), a Colorado appellate court addressed an issue of first impression and held that a limitation of liability provision in the contract between an architect and engineer was ambiguous, but did not render the provision void. Johnson Nathan Strohe,…
Read More

Alabama Enacts New Design Professional Statute That Prohibits Certain Contract Provisions And Establishes A Single Standard Of Care For Alabama Design Professionals

On April 29, 2021, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed a new law that prohibits certain type indemnification provisions in professional services contracts and establishes a single standard of care for Alabama design professionals for Alabama projects governed by Alabama law. The new law, titled “Contract requirements for professional services of design professionals,” went into effect…
Read More

Architect’s Contract To Observe Construction Did Not Create Duty To Ensure That Plumbing Work Complied With Design Plans

In Chicago Ambulatory Surgery Associates, Inc. v. Restore Construction, Inc., 2021 WL 4168597 (Ill. App. Sept. 14, 2021), an Illinois court held an architect that contracted to provide design drawings and make regular site visits did not also undertake a duty to inspect plumbing work for compliance with those drawings. The owner hired Restore Construction,…
Read More

Who Can Offer A Certificate Of Merit Against A Design Professional In Texas

In Barrientos v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc., No. 13-20-00092-CV, 2021 WL 3411869 (Tex. App. Aug. 5, 2021), the Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg held that Texas law mandates that a design professional expert offering opinions against another design professional must be licensed or registered in Texas. On March 4, 2019, Barrientos filed a…
Read More

Tennessee Appellate Court Rules Statute Of Limitations And Repose Defenses In Construction Cases Should Be Submitted To The Jury When Fraudulent Concealment Or Equitable Estoppel Is At Issue

In Joseph Riccardi v. Carl Little Construction Co., Inc., et al., 2021 WL 3137251 (Tenn. App. July 26, 2021), a Tennessee Appellate Court held that the statute of limitations and statute of repose defenses should be submitted to the jury when fraudulent concealment or equitable estoppel is at issue, even if there is no genuine…
Read More

When Is An Architect Required To Notify Its Insurer

In RLI Insurance Company v. Architrave, Inc., 2021 WL 1863259 (D.S.C. May 7, 2021), a federal court in South Carolina held that a factual issue remained as to when an architect was required to put its insurer on notice of a potential claim. Bobbitt Design Build (“Bobbitt”) was hired by Mount Moriah Missionary Baptist Church,…
Read More

Engineer’s Contractual Indemnity Claim Against Contractor Dismissed, As Indemnification Agreement Excluded Claims For Damages To The Work Itself

In County of Saratoga v. Delaware Engineering, D.P.C., 189 A.D.3d 1926, 139 N.Y.S.3d 381 (3d Dept 2020), the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division held that an engineer’s contractual indemnity claim against the contractor was due to be dismissed, as the indemnity provision unambiguously and expressly excluded claims for damage to the “work itself.” In…
Read More

Texas Appellate Court Reaffirms Holding That Certificate Of Merit Addressing Individual Engineer’s Alleged Negligence Satisfies Requirements As To The Employer

In Carlson, Brigance & Doering, Inc. v. Compton, 2020 WL 7233612 (Tex. App. Dec 8, 2020) the Court of Appeals of Texas held that a Certificate of Merit addressing the alleged negligence of an individual engineer does not have to separately address the employer’s alleged negligence arising out of the same acts or omissions.  Forestar…
Read More

Massachusetts Supreme Court Rules That Statute Of Repose For Construction And Design Defect In Multi-Building Project Ran When Each Building Was Substantially Completed

In D’Allessandro v. Lennar Hingham Holdings, LLC, 2020 WL 6438937 (Mass. Nov. 3, 2020), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held the statute of repose governing the claims for design and construction defects for a multi-building condominium project began to run when each building was opened for its intended use or was substantially completed, not when…
Read More